I am quite, quite delighted to share my new arrivals. Over the Seasonal break I was busy formatting work like crazy. For the sheer excitement of it, I decided to play with new size and structure (and look) for Seventeen Syllable Poetry work.

So, what have we . . .
Two volumes of general archive #21. As I’ve started to do a lot of image driven work, both books are in colour, though only intended for my personal library.
I extracted the Seventeen Syllable Poetry work from the overall archive and put it intpo a new format, with a trim size of 7 inches x 4. Also a declarative Stamp. I’m aware the stamp may not be the best tool for the purpose and I have a couple of ideas for what other approaches to pursue, but I don’t have the design skills to execute these, yet. I’ll be studying n the next 12 months to remedy that.


Also, there are two books of Bachelard Interpreted series of poems. One that tells stories, and the other that asks questions in the Seventeen Syllable style.
These books are both is the usual black and white interior format, and I hope to release them in the first half of 2022. If I manage it, there will be a lot of such pairs in the Bachelard Interpreted series.


I haven’t had a chance to get familiar with the 7 x 4 format for these books yet, and am still uncertain about the right way to go. My alternatives for the Seventeens seem to be:
- Stick with the larger (usual) 6 x 9 size, with the poems aligned to the centre of the page. Works fine, but a lot of white space involved.
- Use a 6.5 x 6.5 square format. Maybe. Not sure.
- Use a 6 x 4 format. I’ll ponder what the 7 x 4 does for me before I think about changing.
Costs seem to be around the same as for the standard book size.
They’re a dinky little book, and well worth my while to consider, but the jury is out, at the moment.
Regardless, the 2 Bachelard Interpreteds are vying for first release of 2022.
~
BTW I should mention, this pair of Bachelards isinspired by his book Air and Dreams: An Essay on the Imagination of Movement, and features reverie on the lightness of being, floating flying and similar airy themes.
Great work, Frank. I think the printed word is far more durable than when work is stored electronically, at least for the time being.
LikeLiked by 2 people
THanks Tracy. I’m not much of a memory and memorabilia keeper, but a poem can take me back to the scene of the crime in a trice.
Books are my preference, too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, Tracy. There is a lot of electronic work that is already lost to obsolete technology.
LikeLiked by 2 people
When they’re ont he bookshelf, I can ignore them for life, but they’ll still be there. Works best for me.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That works for me, too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Splendid – congratulations
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Derrick.
LikeLiked by 1 person
These look most impressive, Frank.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Mick. I get very excited when they come in. Makes them real.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m very interested in the smaller trim sizes. Please keep up posted on how you think they’re working out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think they work ok, Liz. I sat down to read yesterday and soon forgot it was a small sizedbook. Perhaps a bit gimmicky? Not sure.
I can see a line of them all similiarly formatted and all Seventeen’s. I’ll stick with it for awhile.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was wondering if the narrowness of the 7X4 might make it a bit hard to hold and read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think they’re fine, in that sense, but remembering that it is short form poetry, only a few words across, with each poem complete on its own page. I’m not sure how well longer-lined and multi-paged poetry or prose would work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m thinking in terms of short-form poetry with images.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m reaching the conclusion that the trim size isn’t adequate, Liz. Ok in some respects, but too much like a pocket diary or similar to work for poetry.
I’ll re-format to 6.5 x 6.5 and take a peek at how that seems. Square probbaly has better proportions. If I’m not happy with that, I’ll revert to normal size (6 x 9) and be done worth it.
Images are very hit and miss, as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for the additional information, Frank. The 7 X 4 just looks too narrow to read comfortably, particuarly with images.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I’ve come full circle on my thinking, Liz.
I’ll stick to the stock standard 6 x 9 size unless I’m doing a picture book, and 8.5 x 8.5 for a picture book (such as the Bears).
Life is too short for me to lose it in second guessing book sizes, is what I’ve concluded.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your conclusion makes sense, particularly when we have to format the book ourselves.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great idea Frank, better in a book. I look forward. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like the covers but I have to admit that the stamp actually made me strangely anxious, as if it said ‘danger, keep out’. Even after I read what was actually there, I continued to feel a weird dissonance? Not sure if it was the angle, the colour [red] or some other visual association. Maybe just change the colour to something that’s pleasant to look at?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll have to come up with something better, Cage. Starting February I’ doing a TAFE graphic design course. Something might come out of that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good for you, Frank. I’ll pick your brains when you’re finished!
LikeLiked by 1 person
We’ll see.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We will. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Book form works for me too Naturally I will want copies
LikeLiked by 1 person